Anti-Spam RFC featured on slashdot, with my comments, long
There is a new anti-forgery proposal which holds a good deal of promise. It is featured in Slashdot here: Slashdot The Anti-Spam Research Group’s Plan for Spam. Below is my response to the author of the proposal (not the slashdot writer :) Hello, I really like the proposal and I think you have done a great job in presenting it. I have seen other previous proposals that didn’t seem to take off, such as “MS records” by Andrew Church or something like that. The first version was similar to your proposal here, but the second one involved a challenge-response type of system based on cryptography and I think that something complex and heavy like that is just an excuse for delay. I feel strongly that the forgery problem has to be solved NOW, or at least we should start to try to solve it now. This is why I agree strongly with your proposal and why I like it so much.